Logann wrote:They knew what the were doing. They knew killing is bad. But they were ten, immature, not fully developed. They knew it was bad, but they were premature.
being ten is NO excuse for torturing a 3-year-old and killing him with cold blood, premeditated, to hide their horrendous actions
14 years is punishment enough for a ten year old. Those years WERE they're LIFE.
they prevented a 3-year-old from living the rest of his and destroyed the lives of an entire family as well - i don't think 14 years quite cut it, and anyway they didn't serve 14 years, they were paroled in 2001
I guess you all don't realize they were TEN. What was goin through their minds? It was fun and ornry to them. They knew what was goin on but they dont realize how serious it is.
It was FUN to them? Do u think it was fun to James Bulger as well? N u seriously don't think they didn't realise how serious it was when the little boy was crying n screaming n they could see the blood running? N they didn't realise how serious it was when they decided to throw him in front of a train?
I guess I dont know how to explain it to you.
No, cause there's no way of explaining how 2 boys can do something so vicious n horrendous to someone else except that they're completely f***** up in their heads
So what if he goes to a university, during his main time of life, he did good. Now he's matured and better. What would you prefere him be the mad killer he was at 10? Right.
No i would prefer Jon Venables n Robert Thompson to be locked up in jail for the rest of their lives thinking about what they did to a 3-year-old kid who couldn't even defend himself, what they did to another human being n how they wrecked the lives of James Bulger's family - not how they wrecked their own lives cause frankly i don't give a s*** about their lives