JamaicanPattlez wrote:Denied. Geno nailed it.
Sam. wrote:Feed No.1:Good Shit.
Feed No.2:Dope ,killed it.
Feed No.3:No criticism.
This might happen.
The thing is give feed and take it back,the more you give...
What? I put that point before him.
Big Ax-D wrote:thats why we need to be on top of it, and tell people that that kind of feedback is unacceptable
The thing is that this Sec'n is soon dying, there was a time when there was at least 3 new pieces a day, now it's just 1 or sometimes 0.Enforcing this could hamper this even more in the current scenario, had this been done awhile ago say like 2 Months ago, this would have been useful.
The level of feedback is going down, no one is voluntarily ready to give feed, even though they view this Sec'n when a new Piece has been made.Just look at the drops by Spyder, there's barely anyone leaving constructive feed apart from a few(lol).It's disgusting to watch that no one cares.
I know two members who give shitty feed that is not more than one line, to top it all it doesn't make any sense and they fail to mention the things that they think that the writer should improve upon. One of this member contacted me Via PM, I explained to him that, observe how other members give their feed and try and do that, there's no excuse like "I'm weak in the feedback thing". I even told him to step his FB game up and that he can face a Sec'n Ban, still he's doing the same shit.
There was a time when members used to get lot's of constructive feed, gone are those days.Big Ax-D, man you need to be online for a longer time and see to that the FB is being given properly or not, otherwise I don't see any need in enforcing this rule.You're strict that's why I'm saying this.
Peace.