Versatility Round 3

by **Blu** » Mar 19th, '13, 21:25

bigray wrote:Geno vs Menzo?

Who wants this? I do.

It would never happen. They would continue arguing until one of them admitted they had the weaker verse.

by **CrashBand** » Mar 19th, '13, 21:27

Badly set-up tournament is a badly set-up tournament.

by **CanadaPure** » Mar 19th, '13, 21:31

CrashBand wrote:
CrashBand wrote:Well, seeding good writers vs good writers kind of failed.

A point so relevant that he had to quote himself for everyone to see it again.

by **Blu** » Mar 19th, '13, 21:31

Trimss beat bigray?

A "verse" with two rhymes beat a somewhat badly-constructed verse from bigray? Loool.

by **CanadaPure** » Mar 19th, '13, 21:32

Blu wrote:Trimss beat bigray?

A "verse" with two rhymes beat a somewhat badly-constructed verse from bigray? Loool.

Bigray should have won that one tbh. Sorry Trimss, but I hated your verse.

by **CrashBand** » Mar 19th, '13, 21:33

No. The seeding made for boring matches. Do you really think Hesky vs Trimss would have been a good/well contested final. (Sorry Trimss, I think you're pretty cool).

And pulling the 2 v 2 is stupid.

by **CrashBand** » Mar 19th, '13, 21:35

Although, replacing JR with Abram as a judge was commendable. :y:

by **CanadaPure** » Mar 19th, '13, 21:36

The main thing I think that brought this all down was the fact that it was way too soon after the last tourny and felt rushed. I think people would have gave more shits if it had been a bit longer after the other one.

by **CrashBand** » Mar 19th, '13, 21:41

Nah, I think the seeding and 2 vs 2 have obviously been the main factors.

by **CanadaPure** » Mar 19th, '13, 21:43

CrashBand wrote:Nah, I think the seeding and 2 vs 2 have obviously been the main factors.

For what's going on now, probably. I mean more for the original missing verses, not Trimss and Hesky dropping out.

by **Blu** » Mar 21st, '13, 01:34

bigray wrote:
Blu wrote:Trimss beat bigray?

A "verse" with two rhymes beat a somewhat badly-constructed verse from bigray? Loool.

At least we wrote an actual verse instead of a cpl words like a 4 year old.

I compliment you and you insult me.

Wow.

by **Spyder** » Mar 26th, '13, 22:32

This still going... Or did we get a historic four person no show Lol

by **CanadaPure** » Mar 27th, '13, 01:55

Spyder wrote:This still going... Or did we get a historic four person no show Lol

R.I.P. Tourney pretty much.

by **Trimss** » Mar 27th, '13, 02:05

CanadaPure wrote:
Blu wrote:Trimss beat bigray?

A "verse" with two rhymes beat a somewhat badly-constructed verse from bigray? Loool.

Bigray should have won that one tbh. Sorry Trimss, but I hated your verse.

Tbh it was terrible but there were more than two rhymes on it. Blu, are you up for a friendly 8 or 16 battle?

by **CanadaPure** » Mar 27th, '13, 04:20

Trimss wrote:
CanadaPure wrote:
Blu wrote:Trimss beat bigray?

A "verse" with two rhymes beat a somewhat badly-constructed verse from bigray? Loool.

Bigray should have won that one tbh. Sorry Trimss, but I hated your verse.

Tbh it was terrible but there were more than two rhymes on it. Blu, are you up for a friendly 8 or 16 battle?

Oh I didn't have a problem with the end rhyme thing, Bigray is like the king of messing with endrhymes. I just preferred his verse.

Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Re: Versatility Round 3

Who is online