Word War 3 Chat

[Mr.DGAF]

I get what you're saying but there shouldn't be any confusion, i asked him a simple question if he can post ours tonight if my opponent is done....spyder said no, so its all good.

Haha, aight man.

EDIT: Shady I think you're tomorrow homie.

[shadyblogger]

I get what you're saying but there shouldn't be any confusion, i asked him a simple question if he can post ours tonight if my opponent is done....spyder said no, so its all good.

Haha, aight man.

EDIT: Shady I think you're tomorrow homie.

Yeah I got it. Thanks man

[Eedee]

Spyder, I edited this thread's OP with the other thread's info. It can get annoying having to go to another thread when we're stuck discussing it here.

[Eedee]

Thank you based Eedee.

Woulve been cool with links to the battles in the OP too

Done.

[shadyblogger]

Thanks Eedee

[Spyder]

Good work skiboski

[Spyder]

Neither from both.

Why do I do these things

[Spyder]

I'm calling it. Double no show. Winner of tomorrow gets a bye

[DetroitSkills]

Dann it. SWA was suppose to destroy snake

[Spyder]

I got deweys and blogger I know will have it done today so should be a match tonight lol

[Spyder]

Totally forgot snake sent me his a while ago. That's on me. Snake moves on

[Spyder]

Ya he probably won't get the second round

[Spyder]

Til the 18th

[CrashBand]

Note to judges:

Who cares who has more punches, or more personals, or more wordplay? You have to judge if these aspects were well-executed.

Badly executed personals shouldn't automatically be positives. Actually, stupid/obvious/forced/cliche wordplay and personals should be negative points.

--

CanadaPure, nice verse m8.

[PAINKILLƎR]

its more so that the others not having any of that at all as opposed to the quantity of all the technical shit. I just poorly worded the criticism. I'm not judging by quantity I assure, if that's what you believe.