bigray wrote:And I hope to god you guys aren't really jacking off to a pair of tits and ass.
I can't stop since I saw the pics.....specially that pic of the curl iron.
Seriously, I didn't see much pics, but some of them were quite disgusting, lol.
bigray wrote:And I hope to god you guys aren't really jacking off to a pair of tits and ass.
Guess_Who wrote:Aone10 wrote:I feel like "they were being careless, they deserved it" is some sort of sick justification for tireless and guilt-free masturbation of these photos.
That's no different than "she was wearing a short skirt, she deserved to get raped".
No innocent person deserves to become a victim, period.
I've held back from going through the pictures because it just doesn't feel right to me. To each their own though, I'm not judging anyone.... but don't be a dick and call them sluts after you just busted loads to pictures you were never supposed to see..... it says a lot about you as a person. I have nothing against pornography because they are consenting adults who are aware that millions of people will be watching them performing shameless acts of sex on the internet.... this is just a sick invasion of privacy.
I think it's stupid to take nudes, especially if you are a high profile person like these celebrities.... I'm hoping people learn from this.
That's exactly what I was trying to explain. Thank you!!
I disagree with the last 2 lines, people should be free to do whatever they want, I mean most of the pics were taken for the bf , husband or whatever, that's their problem. But expose those pictures is violate their privacy. And people want more and more. Guys in the place were I work were going crazy trying to find the video of J.Law, or the pic with ....in her face. And now (some) of those wankers masturbating at that stuff call them sluts....I like Emma Watson tweet about this :
"Even worse than seeing women's privacy violated on social media is reading the accompanying comments that show such a lack of empathy".
Would you like if every pic you have on your phone, no matter what kind of picture it is , were public for the rest of the world?? Another thing here is why there is no picture of any man, and don't tell me male celebrities don't take pics of their thing.....
Solace wrote:Finna catch Tony brushing his teeth in the middle of chugging Jack Daniels
Revolutionary wrote:SliK wrote:Revolutionary wrote:Sluts or not, you're an idiot if you think the internet is a safe place to STORE pictures, regardless of what these pics are.
Like, it's almost as stupid as taking a picture of your credit card and uploading it online to your account, thinking there's no need to remove it (after doing what you wanted to do initially) because it's "your" personal account.
Number of pictures is irrelevant indeed and it doesn't indicate anything, but I really doubt those celebrities knew that their pictures were being automatically uploaded to their iCloud.
That's why I haven't activated google now, haven't enabled location, always got dropbox and photos off and only use them for certain stuff.
So yes, they are idiots for not removing them. Hackers are everywhere and the internet is not and will never be secure.
Where do you think all your financial details are kept and accessed from? Ever use internet banking? Ever paid bills online? Ever purchased from eBay? Ever used Facebook?
If you can't even reliably store a picture on the internet, why the fuck do we bank and live our whole goddamn lives on the internet? If JLaw's nudes are being stored so insecurely - so are her millions of dollars
Stupid logic.
As if we didn't hear stories about stealing money online?
But of course it's different in this case because the money spent to secure photos/files/etc is not comparable to the amount of money that's spent to secure money.
http://www.bankrate.com/finance/savings ... ney-1.aspx
The attack rate differs, the level of security differs, i'm 100% sure this happens to non-famous people on a regular basis but no one knows because those are not famous. In this case the hacker was much smarter (or just lucky) and was able to find those accounts.
The logic is not stupid, it's not my fault you don't get it.
Aone10 wrote:Charlotte wrote:So one of those girls nudes was underage when those pics were taken
To think millions have probably ejaculated to the picture....
Aone10 wrote:Charlotte wrote:So one of those girls nudes was underage when those pics were taken
To think millions have probably ejaculated to the picture....
Menzo wrote:Charlotte wrote:Well you need to draw a line somewhere...
Maybe for you it doesn't matter if youre jacking off to a 17 year old or a 21 year old but it should matter.
Let's all legalize childporn cause the last night of being 10 nothing changes, last night of 11 nothing changes, the last night of being 12 either!
Not the same. 10-12 year olds probably haven't been through puberty
Charlotte wrote:Talk about cringe please, check your own posts in ANY thread.
Charlotte wrote:yung rom living up to his sig
Menzo wrote:CanadaPure wrote:are girls even people tho
No lol
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot]